China has released new guidelines on the use of generative artificial intelligence (AI) in scientific research. The Guidelines For Responsible Research Conduct, published by the Ministry of Science and Technology, aim to promote the “healthy development” of scientific research and cover various aspects of the research process. These guidelines include a ban on the “direct” use of generative AI when applying for research funding and approval. The rules apply to individual researchers and institutions, such as universities and medical centers. The main considerations in the guidelines are ethics, safety, and transparency.
One of the main concerns addressed by the guidelines is the use of AI-generated content. Under the new rules, AI-generated content cannot be listed as a co-author. This has prompted discussions about whether AI should be credited if it discovers new materials or drugs. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the broader philosophical debate of whether AI should be considered equal to humans in the pursuit of knowledge.
While the guidelines do not provide detailed rules for specific situations, they do set out a general framework for the use of AI in research. Generative AI can still be used, but any content or findings that use the technology must be clearly labeled as such. However, some researchers believe that the impact of these guidelines will be limited, as generative AI tends to produce poor-quality project proposals.
There is a divide among experts as to the widespread use of generative AI. Some argue that it is an irreversible trend and banning it across the board is unrealistic and unreasonable. They believe that it is more important to find ways to allow researchers to use AI in an appropriate way while keeping up with international trends. Others, however, express concerns about the use of AI in research and grant applications, highlighting the potential negative effects on graduate students' development of original thinking skills.
The rapid development of AI technology has resulted in significant changes in scientific research paradigms. While acknowledging the benefits of AI, the guidelines were introduced to address problems related to authorship, intellectual property, and data processing. The ministry states that the guidelines are based on a broad consensus in scientific circles and will be updated in response to technological developments.
Regulating the use of AI has been a focus for Beijing, both domestically and internationally. The Interim Measures for the Management of Generative AI Services were introduced in August, promoting “socialist values” and the “healthy” development of publicly available AI content. In November, China, along with other countries and the European Union, signed the Bletchley Declaration, an international pact on regulating the risks associated with rapidly developing AI. The new scientific guidelines build upon these measures, further emphasizing the need for responsible research conduct.
In conclusion, China’s new guidelines on the use of generative AI in scientific research aim to promote ethical, transparent, and fair practices. While the impact of these guidelines may be limited in certain fields, they provide a general framework for the use of AI. The guidelines address concerns about AI-generated content and its proper attribution, as well as its potential impact on graduate students' development of original thinking skills. China’s focus on regulating AI reflects the growing international consensus on the importance of responsible AI development and usage.
Use the share button below if you liked it.